University of Lincoln
Browse

Work and Childcare among Traditional, Equal-Sharing, and Role-Reversed Couples

Download (108.62 kB)
chapter
posted on 2025-01-14, 18:41 authored by Mariana Lobo Pinho, Ruth GauntRuth Gaunt, Andre SoaresAndre Soares

Although societal transformations of the division of paid work and childcare have been observed over recent decades, the arrangements of most couples still reflect traditional gendered norms, with mothers as primary caregivers and fathers as main breadwinners. This persistent gender gap disadvantages men and women, preventing them from organising work and childcare in a way that best suits their family, regardless of gender. This study explored how couples in three parenting arrangements - equal-sharers, role-reversed and traditional - divide paid work and childcare, and the economic and structural factors that facilitate a less gendered division of roles. A sample of 2,813 British parents with children aged 11 or younger completed extensive questionnaires. Our findings suggest that role-reversed couples tend to share housework and childcare slightly more equally than traditional couples. While mothers in traditional arrangements performed almost all the tasks by themselves, fathers who were the main caregivers had more involved partners. Both fathers and mothers who shared equally worked shorter hours than main breadwinners and spent more time with their children as sole caregivers. The duration of parental leave taken after the birth of a child was relatively unaffected by family role and largely determined by gender. Since the birth of the youngest child, breadwinning and equal-sharing fathers used work-from-home and flexible hours less than breadwinners and equal-sharing mothers, while caregiving mothers and fathers were similarly likely to use these schemes. Overall, our findings highlight the factors that facilitate sharing breadwinning and caring responsibilities equally.

Funding

The study reported in this chapter was funded by the Nuffield Foundation, grant #43623 awarded to the second author. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily the Foundation. Visit www.nuffieldfoundation.org.

History

School affiliated with

  • School of Psychology (Research Outputs)
  • School of Psychology, Sport Science and Wellbeing (Research Outputs)

Publication Title

Advances in Psychology Research

Volume

155

Pages/Article Number

109-130

Publisher

Nova Science Publications

ISBN

979-8-89530-168-5

Date Submitted

2024-08-23

Date Accepted

2024-11-05

Date of Final Publication

2024-12-09

Relevant SDGs

  • SDG 5 - Gender Equality

Open Access Status

  • Not Open Access

Date Document First Uploaded

2024-12-07

Publisher statement

Archiving policy: https://novapublishers.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/FAQ-Authors-Rights-.pdf