University of Lincoln
Browse
1/1
3 files

Health-Promoting Behaviours following Primary Treatment for Cancer: A Rural–Urban Comparison from a Cross-Sectional Study

Version 4 2024-03-12, 20:53
Version 3 2023-10-29, 18:06
journal contribution
posted on 2024-03-12, 20:53 authored by David NelsonDavid Nelson, Ian McgonagleIan Mcgonagle, Christine Jackson, Trish Tsuro, Emily Scott, Mark GussyMark Gussy, Ros KaneRos Kane

Aim: To compare health-promoting behaviours among rural and urban residents following primary treatment for cancer. Methods: A cross-sectional survey collecting demographic variables and data pertaining to health-promoting behaviours, documented using the 52-item Health Promotion Lifestyle Profile II (HPLP-II) measure, which is categorised into six subscales: (1) health responsibility, (2) spiritual growth, (3) physical activity, (4) interpersonal relations, (5) nutrition, and (6) stress management. Residence was defined using the U.K. Office for National Statistics RUC 2011 Rural Urban Classifications. The Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) Decile was used to measure deprivation. Quantitative data were analysed using independent samples t-test and multiple linear regression. Qualitative data from open-ended questions were analysed thematically. Results: In total, 227 participants with a range of cancer types completed the questionnaire. Fifty-three percent were residents in urban areas and forty-five percent in rural areas. Rural participants scored significantly higher on health responsibility (p = 0.001), nutrition (p = 0.001), spiritual growth (p = 0.004), and interpersonal relationships (p = 0.001), as well as on the overall HPLP-II (p = 0.001). When controlling for deprivation, age, marital status, and education, rural–urban residence was a significant predictor of exhibiting health-promoting behaviours. A central theme from the qualitative data was the concept of “moving on” from cancer following treatment, by making adjustments to physical, social, psychological, spiritual, and emotional wellbeing. Conclusions: This research revealed, for the first time, differences in health-promoting behaviours among rural and urban U.K. populations who have completed primary cancer treatment. Rural residence can provide a positive environment for engaging with health-promoting behaviours following a cancer diagnosis and treatment.

History

School affiliated with

  • Lincoln International Institute for Rural Health (Research Outputs)

Publication Title

Current Oncology

Volume

30

Issue

2

Pages/Article Number

1585-1597

Publisher

MDPI

ISSN

1718-7729

Date Submitted

2023-01-27

Date Accepted

2023-01-24

Date of First Publication

2023-01-25

Date of Final Publication

2023-01-25

Date Document First Uploaded

2023-01-25

ePrints ID

53190