University of Lincoln
Browse

A comparison of automated and manual techniques for measurement of electrospun fibre diameter

Version 2 2024-03-12, 13:53
Version 1 2024-03-01, 09:24
journal contribution
posted on 2024-03-12, 13:53 authored by Jon Stanger, Nick TuckerNick Tucker, Neil Buunk, Yen Truong
<p>Electrospinning is a fibre manufacturing process, and fibre diameter is a fundamentalproperty. We compare diameter measurements made by human operators against two automated algorithms (FibreQuant™ and SEMAnalyser™). The effects of scanning electron microscopy preparation by iridium, gold and carbon coating on fibre diameter are alsoexamined.A human takes 2.2 h to make 150 measurements. Automated analysis produces 9000 measurements less than 5 minutes. The automated method produces results without researcher bias and with greater consistency, but will occasionally include incorrect measurements because of the simple heuristics used. The manual method used by human operators shows larger variation in reported averages and is labour intensive. Before obtaining scanning electron microscopy images, the fibre samples require a conductive coating to prevent charging and burning of the fibres; the effects of SEM preparation methods such as iridium, gold and carbon coating showed that iridium coating had the least impact on fibre diameter.</p>

History

School affiliated with

  • School of Engineering (Research Outputs)

Publication Title

Polymer Testing

Volume

40

Pages/Article Number

4-12

Publisher

Elsevier

ISSN

0142-9418

Date Submitted

2015-10-28

Date Accepted

2014-08-06

Date of First Publication

2014-08-20

Date of Final Publication

2014-12-01

Date Document First Uploaded

2015-10-23

ePrints ID

19249

Usage metrics

    University of Lincoln (Research Outputs)

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC