University of Lincoln
Browse

Cost effectiveness of community leg ulcer clinics: randomised controlled trial

Version 4 2024-03-12, 14:27
Version 3 2023-10-29, 10:56
journal contribution
posted on 2024-03-12, 14:27 authored by C.J. Morrell, S.J. Walters, S. Dixon, K.A. Collins, Louise Brereton, J. Peters, C. G. D. Brooker
<p>Objectives: To establish the relative cost effectiveness of community leg ulcer clinics that use four layer compression bandaging versus usual care provided by district nurses. Design: Randomised controlled trial with 1 year of follow up. Setting: Eight community based research clinics in four trusts in Trent. Subjects: 233 patients with venous leg ulcers allocated at random to intervention (120) or control (113) group. Interventions: Weekly treatment with four layer bandaging in a leg ulcer clinic (clinic group) or usual care at home by the district nursing service (control group). Main outcome measures: Time to complete ulcer healing, patient health status, and recurrence of ulcers. Satisfaction with care, use of services, and personal costs were also monitored. Results: The ulcers of patients in the clinic group tended to heal sooner than those in the control group over the whole 12 month follow up (log rank P=0.03). At 12 weeks, 34% of patients in the clinic group were healed compared with 24% in the control. The crude initial healing rate of ulcers in intervention compared with control patients was 1.45 (95% confidence interval 1.04 to 2.03). No significant differences were found between the groups in health status. Mean total NHS costs were £878.06 per year for the clinic group and £859.34 for the control (P=0.89). Conclusions: Community based leg ulcer clinics with trained nurses using four layer bandaging is more effective than traditional home based treatment. This benefit is achieved at a small additional cost and could be delivered at reduced cost if certain service configurations were used.</p>

History

School affiliated with

  • School of Health and Social Care (Research Outputs)

Publication Title

BMJ

Volume

316

Issue

7143

Pages/Article Number

1487-1491

Publisher

British Medical Journal Publishing Group

ISSN

0959-8138

eISSN

1756-1833

Date Submitted

2016-06-09

Date Accepted

1998-02-02

Date of First Publication

1998-05-16

Date of Final Publication

1998-05-16

Date Document First Uploaded

2016-06-09

ePrints ID

23237

Usage metrics

    University of Lincoln (Research Outputs)

    Keywords

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC