Diffusion of novel foraging behaviour in Amazon parrots through social learning
Version 2 2024-03-12, 14:51Version 2 2024-03-12, 14:51
Version 1 2024-03-01, 09:55Version 1 2024-03-01, 09:55
journal contribution
posted on 2024-03-12, 14:51 authored by Alejandra Morales Picard, Lauren Hogan, Megan L. Lambert, Anna WilkinsonAnna Wilkinson, Amanda M. Seed, Katie E. Slocombe<p>While social learning has been demonstrated in species across many taxa, the role it plays in everyday foraging decisions is not well understood. Investigating social learning during foraging could shed light on the emergence of cultural variation in different groups. We used an open diffusion experiment to examine the spread of a novel foraging technique in captive Amazon parrots. Three groups were tested using a two-action foraging box, including experimental groups exposed to demonstrators using different techniques and control birds. We also examined the influence of agonistic and pilfering behaviour on task acquisition. We found evidence of social learning: more experimental birds than control birds interacted with and opened the box. The birds were, however, no more likely to use the demonstrated technique than the non-demonstrated one, making local or stimulus enhancement the most likely mechanism. Exhibiting aggression was positively correlated with box opening, whilst receiving aggression did not reduce motivation to engage with the box, indicating that willingness to defend access to the box was important in task acquisition. Pilfering food and success in opening the box were also positively correlated; however, having food pilfered did not affect victimsâ?? motivation to interact with the box. In a group context, pilfering may promote learning of new foraging opportunities. Although previous studies have demonstrated that psittacines are capable of imitation, in this naturalistic set-up there was no evidence that parrots copied the demonstrated opening technique. Foraging behaviour in wild populations of Amazons could therefore be facilitated by low-fidelity social learning mechanisms. © 2016 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg</p>
History
School affiliated with
- Department of Life Sciences (Research Outputs)
Publication Title
Animal CognitionVolume
20Issue
2Pages/Article Number
258-298Publisher
Springer VerlagExternal DOI
ISSN
1435-9448eISSN
1435-9456Date Submitted
2016-11-04Date Accepted
2016-10-19Date of First Publication
2016-10-26Date of Final Publication
2017-03-01Date Document First Uploaded
2016-11-10ePrints ID
24912Usage metrics
Categories
Licence
Exports
RefWorksRefWorks
BibTeXBibTeX
Ref. managerRef. manager
EndnoteEndnote
DataCiteDataCite
NLMNLM
DCDC


