University of Lincoln
Browse

Face morphing attacks: Investigating detection with humans and computers

Version 2 2024-03-12, 17:37
Version 1 2024-03-05, 10:47
journal contribution
posted on 2024-03-12, 17:37 authored by Robin KramerRobin Kramer, Michael MirekuMichael Mireku, Tessa Flack, Kay RitchieKay Ritchie
<p>BackgroundIn recent years, fraudsters have begun to use readily accessible digital manipulation techniques in order to carry out face morphing attacks. By submitting a morph image (a 50/50 average of two people’s faces) for inclusion in an official document such as a passport, it might be possible that both people sufficiently resemble the morph that they are each able to use the resulting genuine ID document. Limited research with low-quality morphs has shown that human detection rates were poor but that training methods can improve performance. Here, we investigate human and computer performance with high-quality morphs, comparable with those expected to be used by criminals.ResultsOver four experiments, we found that people were highly error-prone when detecting morphs and that training did not produce improvements. In a live matching task, morphs were accepted at levels suggesting they represent a significant concern for security agencies and detection was again error-prone. Finally, we found that a simple computer model outperformed our human participants.ConclusionsTaken together, these results reinforce the idea that advanced computational techniques could prove more reliable than training people when fighting these types of morphing attacks. Our findings have important implications for security authorities worldwide.</p>

History

School affiliated with

  • School of Psychology (Research Outputs)

Publication Title

Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications

Volume

4

Issue

1

Pages/Article Number

28

Publisher

Springer

eISSN

2365-7464

Date Submitted

2019-08-05

Date Accepted

2019-06-21

Date of First Publication

2019-07-29

Date of Final Publication

2019-12-31

Date Document First Uploaded

2019-08-03

ePrints ID

36600

Usage metrics

    University of Lincoln (Research Outputs)

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC