University of Lincoln
Browse
- No file added yet -

Leaving post-anything urban studies behind?

Download (210.4 kB)
Version 2 2024-10-01, 14:11
Version 1 2024-07-08, 13:59
journal contribution
posted on 2024-10-01, 14:11 authored by Jay EmeryJay Emery

 

Luger and Schwarze’s critical unsettling of post-industrial is a 

presciently welcome one. For some years now, I – and others – have become increasingly uncomfortable with referring to and describing the locations of our research as ‘post-industrial’ (Emery, 2023; Clark, 2023). The main focus of this commentary is on the facets of Luger and Schwarze’s (2024) arguments as they relate to non-metropolitan deindustrializing urbanisms in the North Atlantic in an attempt to develop how we better conceptualize, understand and do justice to and with

such spaces. The main thrust of the contribution is for the affective intensities and traumas of deindustrialization to be brought into closer analytical dialogue with the profusion of processes of associated with, in particular, ‘organized abandonment’ (Gilmore, 2022) and ‘neoliberal urbanism’

(Silver, 2021). In insisting on classed experiences and knowledge shaping these dialogues, there remains hope for urban studies to contribute to an emergent multi-ethnic class politics around 7 commonalities of contemporary as well as historical class violence.

History

School affiliated with

  • Department of Geography (Research Outputs)
  • College of Health and Science (Research Outputs)

Publication Title

Dialogues in Urban Research

Volume

2

Issue

2

Pages/Article Number

210-213

Publisher

SAGE

ISSN

2754-1258

eISSN

2754-1258

Date Submitted

2024-05-17

Date Accepted

2024-05-20

Date of First Publication

2024-06-11

Date of Final Publication

2024-07-01

Open Access Status

  • Open Access

Date Document First Uploaded

2024-06-19

Usage metrics

    University of Lincoln (Research Outputs)

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC