University of Lincoln
Browse

Low survival of strongly footed pheasants may explain constraints on lateralization

Download all (3 MB)
Version 4 2024-03-12, 16:58
Version 3 2023-10-29, 13:51
journal contribution
posted on 2024-03-12, 16:58 authored by Mark A Whiteside, Mackenzie M Bess, Elisa Frasnelli, Christine E Beardsworth, Ellis J. G. Langley, Jayden O. van Horik, Joah R. Madden
<p>Brain lateralization is considered adaptive because it leads to behavioral biases and specializations that bring fitness benefits. Across species, strongly lateralized individuals perform better in specific behaviors likely to improve survival. What constrains continued exaggerated lateralization? We measured survival of pheasants, finding that individuals with stronger bias in their footedness had shorter life expectancies compared to individuals with weak biases. Consequently, weak, or no footedness provided the highest fitness benefits. If, as suggested, footedness is indicative of more general brain lateralization, this could explain why continued brain lateralization is constrained even though it may improve performance in specific behaviors.</p>

History

School affiliated with

  • Department of Life Sciences (Research Outputs)

Publication Title

Scientific Reports

Volume

8

Issue

13791

Publisher

Nature Publishing Group

ISSN

2045-2322

Date Submitted

2018-10-09

Date Accepted

2018-08-01

Date of First Publication

2018-09-13

Date of Final Publication

2018-09-13

Date Document First Uploaded

2018-09-24

ePrints ID

33316

Usage metrics

    University of Lincoln (Research Outputs)

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC