University of Lincoln
Browse

Multi-method development of new ambulance service quality and performance measures

Version 2 2024-03-12, 15:54
Version 1 2024-03-01, 10:24
journal contribution
posted on 2024-03-12, 15:54 authored by Jo Coster, Niro Siriwardena, Janette Turner, Richard Jacques, Annabel Crum, Jon Nicholl
<p>BackgroundThe scope to measure the quality and performance of ambulance service care is limited by poor access to follow up patient information and lack of consensus about what to measure. The Prehospital Outcomes for Evidence Based Evaluation (PhOEBE) research programme aims to address these research gaps by identifying potentially important prehospital quality measures and testing these using a prehospital/linked?subsequent health service dataset.MethodsWe undertook systematic reviews of published and aspirational measures, together with interviews with ambulance service users to identify potential measures. Measures identified from reviews and interviews were prioritised using a multi-stakeholder consensus conference. Measures identified as high priority were further refined and ranked through an expert Delphi method and a service user/patient public involvement workshop. High ranking measures were further assessed against criteria for good outcome measures, including feasibility, importance and relevance, to create a shortlist of measures.Results Eight high-ranking measures were shortlisted following assessment against criteria for good outcome measures. These were:-Mean reduction in pain score-Proportion of serious emergency conditions correctly identified-Average response time (mean/median)-Proportion of non-conveyance decisions which resulted in admission or death within 3?days (hear and treat and see and treat)-Proportion of patients with a low risk of death, who subsequently die within 3?days of an ambulance contact-Proportion of ambulance patients with a serious emergency condition who survive to admission, and to 7?days post-admission-Proportion of unnecessary transports to ED-Proportion of cases with a specific condition treated in accordance with established protocols and guidelines, e.g. stroke, diabetes, fallsConclusionThese measures can be used to assess the impact of care provided by the ambulance service and to support quality improvement through monitoring, audit and service evaluation. Some measures are based on ambulance service data only whereas others require additional linked hospital data.</p>

Funding

National Institute for Health Research (NIHR)

History

School affiliated with

  • School of Health and Social Care (Research Outputs)

Publication Title

Emergency Medicine Journal

Volume

34

Pages/Article Number

e2-e2

Publisher

BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and the College of Emergency Medicine

ISSN

1472-0205

eISSN

1472-0213

Date Submitted

2017-11-08

Date Accepted

2017-03-29

Date of First Publication

2017-09-28

Date of Final Publication

2017-10-01

Date Document First Uploaded

2017-11-06

ePrints ID

29419

Usage metrics

    University of Lincoln (Research Outputs)

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC