Neoliberalism, World-System Position, and Biodiversity Loss: A Cross-National Examination of Threatened Species
Abstract
Several studies provide evidence that social, economic, political, and conservation-related factors impact cross-national biodiversity loss. One theoretical argument concerning biodiversity loss that has not been directly assessed involves the relationship between species loss and neoliberalism. Generally, neoliberalism promotes free markets. This has become a dominant philosophy across nations, though the strength of neoliberalism varies cross-nationally, and affects how nations interact with one another as resource users and providers. Given how neoliberal policies work to integrate nations into a single global capitalist economy, we assess neoliberalism’s effects on threatened species alongside a nation’s position in the global world system. The current study examines nine sets of negative binomial regression models analyzing the effect of neoliberalism, world system position and a set of control variables on species biodiversity loss across a sample of 104 countries for which all relevant variables were available. We find some support that neoliberalism increases biodiversity loss in fully assessed species (i.e., birds and amphibians). We also find support for the hypothesis that there is more biodiversity loss in the semi-periphery and periphery of the world system, compared with core countries in fully assessed threatened species. We argue that the results support previous research showing effects for various arguments employed within environmental sociology to explore biodiversity loss.
History
School affiliated with
- School of Social and Political Sciences (Research Outputs)
- College of Arts, Social Sciences, and Humanities (Research Outputs)
Publication Title
Sociology of DevelopmentVolume
10Issue
3Pages/Article Number
335–365Publisher
University of California PressExternal DOI
eISSN
2374-538XDate Submitted
2023-10-01Date Accepted
2024-05-06Date of First Publication
2024-05-08Date of Final Publication
2024-10-01Open Access Status
- Not Open Access