University of Lincoln
Browse

No atheists in foxholes: arguments for (but not against) afterlife belief buffers mortality salience effects for atheists

Version 2 2024-03-12, 13:49
Version 1 2024-03-01, 09:22
journal contribution
posted on 2024-03-12, 13:49 authored by Nathan HeflickNathan Heflick, Jamie L. Goldenberg,
<p>Terror management theory (TMT) posits that people cope with mortality concerns via symbolic immortality (e.g., secular cultural beliefs that outlast death) and/or literal immortality (afterlife belief). However, what happens when these two forms of immortality conflict, as in atheism? Would atheists’ mortality concerns be better assuaged by affirming an afterlife, or by affirming their literal immortality-denying worldview? Drawing on an untested TMT hypothesis, we predicted that atheists would be buffered from mortality concerns if their atheistic worldview – no life after death – was challenged, but not if it was supported. Results confirmed the hypothesis and were also found for theists and agnostics. These findings support TMT’s claim that literal immortality is of paramount importance in ameliorating death concerns.</p>

History

School affiliated with

  • School of Psychology (Research Outputs)

Publication Title

British Journal of Social Psychology

Volume

51

Issue

2

Pages/Article Number

385-392

Publisher

Wiley

ISSN

0144-6665

eISSN

2044-8309

Date Submitted

2015-09-30

Date Accepted

2011-06-28

Date of First Publication

2011-10-13

Date of Final Publication

2012-06-12

Date Document First Uploaded

2015-09-29

ePrints ID

18885

Usage metrics

    University of Lincoln (Research Outputs)

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC