University of Lincoln
Browse

Non‑gastrointestinal symptom burden following colorectal cancer treatment—a systematic review

journal contribution
posted on 2024-10-29, 15:13 authored by Darren Fernandes, David NelsonDavid Nelson, Marishona OrtegaMarishona Ortega, Niro Siriwardena, Graham Law, Jervoise N Andreyev

Background: Colorectal cancer is one of the most common malignancies worldwide. Improvements in screening and treatment have allowed for earlier detection and longer survival. However, treatments, which may involve surgery, radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy, often lead to patients developing both gastrointestinal and non-gastrointestinal symptoms that can persist long term. This systematic review aims to understand better the non-gastrointestinal symptoms that patients develop after colorectal cancer treatment and how these are identified and assessed through the use of questionnaires. Method: The review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, PsycINFO and Cochrane Library were searched. Eligible studies evaluated the non-gastrointestinal symptoms that patients had developed and continued to have at 12 months or longer after treatment. Studies that were performed on patients who were within 12 months of treatment, who had a recurrent or a secondary cancer, had stage 4 cancer/were palliative or that looked solely at gastro-intestinal symptoms were excluded. Articles were limited to studies on human subjects written in English published between February 2012 and July 2024. Results: The searches identified 3491 articles. Thirty-seven articles met the inclusion criteria, of which, 33 were quantitative, 2 were qualitative and 2 were mixed methods study designs. Nearly two-thirds (n = 22) were cross-sectional studies, whereas 14 were longitudinal. One study had both a cross-sectional and longitudinal component to it. Most studies were of medium to high quality based on the Newcastle Ottawa Scale (n = 23) and were conducted in 14 countries, the majority of which were performed in the Netherlands (n = 14). The majority of participants in the included studies (n = 30/37) were men. There were also three studies that were performed with only female participants and one study that was performed with male participants only. The age range of research participants across all the studies was 29 to 89 years. Forty-five different validated questionnaires containing 5–125 question items were used to collect information on the side effects and impact of colorectal cancer treatment. Completion rate for questionnaires varied from 30 to 100% (median 63.5%). These determined effects on quality of life, emotional/psychological distress, sexual and urinary dysfunction, neuropathy, fatigue and hip pain. Conclusion: This systematic review highlighted a wide range of longer-term non-gastrointestinal symptoms that frequently adversely affect QoL following treatment. These studies included highlighting the importance of nutrition/diet, physical activity, spirituality and communication in managing these long-term side effects. 

Funding

Darren Fernandes received funding from the East Midlands Cancer Alliance (EMCA) to undertake this systematic review as part of a wider PhD study exploring symptom burden in patients following colorectal cancer treatment.

History

School affiliated with

  • College of Health and Science (Research Outputs)
  • Lincoln Institute for Rural and CoastalHealth (Research Outputs)
  • School of Health and Social Care (Research Outputs)

Publication Title

Supportive Care in Cancer

Volume

32

Pages/Article Number

699

Publisher

Springer

ISSN

0941-4355

eISSN

1433-7339

Date Submitted

2024-03-18

Date Accepted

2024-09-25

Date of First Publication

2024-10-03

Date of Final Publication

2024-10-03

Funder

East Midlands Cancer Alliance

Open Access Status

  • Open Access

Date Document First Uploaded

2024-10-05

Publisher statement

This version of the article has been accepted for publication, after peer review (when applicable) and is subject to Springer Nature’s AM terms of use (https://www.springernature.com/gp/open-research/policies/accepted-manuscript-terms), but is not the Version of Record and does not reflect post-acceptance improvements, or any corrections. The Version of Record is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-024-08903-7