University of Lincoln
Browse

Perceptions and experiences of trainers and trainees of UK workplace-based assessment for general practice licensing: a mixed methods survey

Download (920.12 kB)
Version 2 2024-12-13, 17:01
Version 1 2024-10-24, 15:28
journal contribution
posted on 2024-12-13, 17:01 authored by Niro Siriwardena, Viet-Hai PhungViet-Hai Phung, Kim Emerson, Tom Anstey
<p><strong>Background</strong></p> <p><br></p> <p>Workplace-Based Assessment (WPBA) forms a major component of the UK General Practitioner (GP) licensing, together with knowledge and clinical skills examination. WPBA includes Case-based Discussion, Consultation Observation Tool, Mini-Consultation Exercise, Multisource Feedback, Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire, Clinical Examination and Procedural Skills, Clinical Supervisor’s Report, and Educational Supervisor Review. We aimed to investigate GP trainees’ and trainers’ perceptions and experiences of WPBA regarding validity and fairness.</p> <h3><strong>Methods</strong></h3> <p>We used a national online survey, with Likert-scaled and free-text responses, to a convenience sample of GP trainees and trainers, on perceptions and experiences of WPBA. Analysis included descriptive statistics, scale development, and regression models to investigate factors associated with attitudes towards WPBA, with thematic analysis of free text responses supported by NVivo 12.</p> <h3><strong>Results</strong></h3> <p>There were 2,088 responses from 1,176 trainees and 912 trainers. Both groups were generally positive towards WPBA, with trainers more positive or similar to trainees towards individual assessments. In a multivariable regression model, accounting for sex, ethnicity and country of primary medical qualification, trainees were significantly less positive (<em>p</em> < 0.001) while international medical graduates (IMGs) trained outside the European Economic Area (EEA) were significantly more (<em>p</em> < 0.001) positive towards WPBA. Qualitative analysis revealed varying concerns about validity and relevance, assessment burden, potential for bias, fairness to protected characteristics groups, gaps in assessment, and perceptions of individual assessments.</p> <h3><strong>Discussion</strong></h3> <p>Trainers’ greater positivity towards elements of WPBA accords with their role as assessors. Despite concerns about bias, IMGs from outside the EEA were significantly more positive towards WPBA.</p>

Funding

AS, KE and TA are funded by the Royal College of General Practitioners.

History

School affiliated with

  • School of Health and Social Care (Research Outputs)
  • College of Health and Science (Research Outputs)
  • Lincoln Institute for Rural and Coastal Health (Research Outputs)

Publication Title

Education for Primary Care

Volume

35

Issue

5

Pages/Article Number

147 - 159

Publisher

Taylor & Francis

ISSN

1473-9879

eISSN

1475-990X

Date Submitted

2024-02-07

Date Accepted

2024-07-08

Date of First Publication

2024-08-08

Date of Final Publication

2024-09-02

Funder

AS, KE and TA are funded by the Royal College of General Practitioners.

Open Access Status

  • Open Access

Usage metrics

    University of Lincoln (Research Outputs)

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC