University of Lincoln
Browse

The cruel optimism of educational technology teacher ambassador spaces

Download (596.3 kB)
Version 2 2024-07-26, 14:24
Version 1 2024-01-08, 09:27
journal contribution
posted on 2024-07-26, 14:24 authored by Kali ThompsonKali Thompson

In the last 20 years, neoliberal ideology has heavily influenced the U.S. education system, opening public education up to private corporations as a profitable business endeavor. In this paper, I inquire (Pierre, 2018, 2021) into educational technology (edtech) teacher ambassador programs through a blog post I wrote as a former second-grade teacher and ambassador for a prominent K-12 edtech company. I argue one way these exploitative spaces operate is through educators’ attachment (Berlant, 2011) to the idea of being a good enough woman teacher (Pittard, 2015) fueled by neoliberal discourses of “keeping up” (Walkerdine, 2003). In other words, the material-discursive apparatus of these program spaces produces a “cruel optimism” for what we could be, rather than what we are, which in turn produces further profit for edtech companies. Overall, this paper grapples with how these programs may appear or feel mutually beneficial for educators, yet are often only monetarily beneficial for edtech companies and their investors.

History

School affiliated with

  • School of Education (Research Outputs)

Publication Title

Power and Education

Volume

16

Issue

2

Pages/Article Number

103-NP1

Publisher

SAGE Publications

ISSN

1757-7438

Date Submitted

2023-09-28

Date Accepted

2023-03-01

Date of First Publication

2023-03-23

Date of Final Publication

2024-07-28

Date Document First Uploaded

2023-09-25

ePrints ID

56429

Usage metrics

    University of Lincoln (Research Outputs)

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC