University of Lincoln
Browse

The gendered dimensions of informal institutions in the Australian construction industry

Version 2 2024-03-12, 18:39
Version 1 2024-03-01, 11:43
journal contribution
posted on 2024-03-12, 18:39 authored by Natalie Galea, Abigail Powell, Martin Loosemore, Louise Chappell
<p>The construction industry is the most male-dominated in Australia, despite companies implementing formal policies and initiatives to address this. While previous research has examined the role of workplace culture as a barrier towomen in the industry, our research investigates the role informal institutions play in obstructing gender equity in construction. We examine the gendered dimension of informal institutions (practices, narratives and norms) in twomultinational Australian construction companies using feminist institutional (FI) theory and rapid ethnography. The findings show that informal gendered institutions obstruct women’s recruitment, retention and progression inconstruction. Recruitment into and within the industry is framed by male sponsorship, cultural fit and traditional education pipelines. Retention is compromised by poor parental leave practices and norms, which tolerate sexismand gender stereotypes, as well as unsustainable work practices. Progression is impaired by the need for strategic alliances with powerful men and a lack of transparency around promotion opportunities.The construction industry is the most male-dominated in Australia, despite companies implementing formal policies and initiatives to address this. While previous research has examined the role of workplace culture as a barrier to women in the industry, our research investigates the role informal institutions play in obstructing gender equity in construction. We examine the gendereddimension of informal institutions (practices, narratives and norms) in two multinational Australian construction companies using feminist institutional (FI) theory and rapid ethnography. The findings show that informal genderedinstitutions obstruct women’s recruitment, retention and progression in construction. Recruitment into and within the industry is framed by male sponsorship, cultural fit and traditional education pipelines. Retention is compromised by poor parental leave practices and norms, which tolerate sexism and gender stereotypes, as well as unsustainable work practices. Progression is impaired by the need for strategic alliances with powerful men and a lack of transparency around promotion opportunities.</p>

History

School affiliated with

  • University of Lincoln (Historic Research Outputs)

Publication Title

Gender, Work & Organization

Volume

27

Issue

6

Pages/Article Number

1214-1231

Publisher

Wiley

ISSN

0968-6673

eISSN

1468-0432

Date Submitted

2020-05-28

Date Accepted

2020-04-15

Date of First Publication

2020-04-21

Date of Final Publication

2020-11-30

Date Document First Uploaded

2020-05-22

ePrints ID

40920

Usage metrics

    University of Lincoln (Research Outputs)

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC