posted on 2024-03-14, 16:20authored byFiona Irvine, Maria T Clark, Nikolaos Efstathiou, Oliver Rudolf HERBER, Fiona Howroyd, Dana Sammut, Lesley GratrixLesley Gratrix, Aile Trumm, Tove Hanssen, Julie Taylor, Caroline Bradbury-Jones
<p><strong>Aims:</strong> To consider the scope and quality of mixed methods research in nursing.</p>
<p><strong>Design:</strong> Focused mapping review and synthesis (FMRS).</p>
<p><strong>Data sources:</strong> Five purposively selected journals: International Journal of Nursing </p>
<p>Studies, Journal of Nursing Scholarship, Journal of Advanced Nursing, Worldviews on </p>
<p>Evidence-Based Nursing, and Journal of Mixed Methods Research.</p>
<p><strong>Review methods: </strong>In the target journals, titles and abstracts from papers published </p>
<p>between 2015–2018 were searched for the words or derivative words ‘mixed meth?ods’. Additional keyword searches were undertaken using each journal's search tool. </p>
<p>We included studies that investigated nursing and reported to use a mixed methods </p>
<p>approach. Articles that met the inclusion criteria were read in full and information </p>
<p>was extracted onto a predetermined pro forma. Findings across journals were then </p>
<p>synthesized to illustrate the current state of mixed methods research in nursing.</p>
<p><strong>Results</strong>: We located 34 articles that reported on mixed methods research, conducted </p>
<p>across 18 countries. Articles differed significantly both within and across journals in </p>
<p>terms of conformity to a mixed methods approach. We assessed the studies for the </p>
<p>quality of their reporting as regard the use of mixed methods. Nineteen studies were </p>
<p>rated as satisfactory or good, with 15 rated as poorly described. Primarily, a poor rat?ing was due to the absence of stating an underpinning methodological approach to </p>
<p>the study and/or limited detail of a crucial integration phase.</p>
<p><strong>Conclusions:</strong> Our FMRS revealed a paucity of published mixed methods research </p>
<p>in the journals selected. When they are published, there are limitations in the detail </p>
<p>given to the underpinning methodological approach and theoretical explanation</p>
<p><br></p>
<p><br></p>