University of Lincoln
Browse

Understanding the impact of distance and disadvantage on lung cancer care and outcomes: a study protocol

Download (1.12 MB)
journal contribution
posted on 2024-08-21, 12:54 authored by Daisy McInnerney, Samantha L. Quaife, Samuel CookeSamuel Cooke, Lucy Mitchinson, Zara Pogson, William Ricketts, Adam Januszewski, Anna Lerner, Dawn Skinner, Sarah Civello, Ros KaneRos Kane, Ava Harding-Bell, Lynn Calman, Peter Selby, Michael D. Peake, David NelsonDavid Nelson

 

Background

Lung cancer is the third most common cancer in the UK and the leading cause of cancer mortality globally. NHS England guidance for optimum lung cancer care recommends management and treatment by a specialist team, with experts concentrated in one place, providing access to specialised diagnostic and treatment facilities. However, the complex and rapidly evolving diagnostic and treatment pathways for lung cancer, together with workforce limitations, make achieving this challenging. This place-based, behavioural science-informed qualitative study aims to explore how person-related characteristics interact with a person’s location relative to specialist services to impact their engagement with the optimal lung pathway, and to compare and contrast experiences in rural, coastal, and urban communities. This study also aims to generate translatable evidence to inform the evidence-based design of a patient engagement intervention to improve lung cancer patients’ and informal carers’ participation in and experience of the lung cancer care pathway.

Methods

A qualitative cross-sectional interview study with people diagnosed with lung cancer < 6 months before recruitment (in receipt of surgery, radical radiotherapy, or living with advanced disease) and their informal carers. Participants will be recruited purposively from Barts Health NHS Trust and United Lincolnshire Hospitals NHS Trusts to ensure a diverse sample across urban and rural settings. Semi-structured interviews will explore factors affecting individuals’ capability, opportunity, and motivation to engage with their recommended diagnostic and treatment pathway. A framework approach, informed by the COM-B model, will be used to thematically analyse facilitators and barriers to patient engagement.

Discussion

The study aligns with the current policy priority to ensure that people with cancer, no matter where they live, can access the best quality treatments and care. The evidence generated will be used to ensure that lung cancer services are developed to meet the needs of rural, coastal, and urban communities. The findings will inform the development of an intervention to support patient engagement with their recommended lung cancer pathway.

Protocol registration

The study received NHS Research Ethics Committee (Ref: 23/SC/0255) and NHS Health Research Authority (IRAS ID 328531) approval on 04/08/2023. The study was prospectively registered on Open Science Framework (16/10/2023; https://osf.io/njq48).

Funding

Cancer Research UK is a registered charity in England and Wales (1089464), Scotland (SC041666) and the Isle of Man (1103). This research was funded by the Social and Behavioural Research Team, Cancer Research UK (PICATR-2022/100019; PICTAR-2022/100017). http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/. T

History

School affiliated with

  • College of Health and Science (Research Outputs)
  • Lincoln Institute for Rural and CoastalHealth (Research Outputs)
  • Lincoln Medical School (Research Outputs)
  • School of Health and Social Care (Research Outputs)

Publication Title

BMC Cancer

Volume

24

Pages/Article Number

942

Publisher

BMC

eISSN

1471-2407

Date Submitted

2024-02-27

Date Accepted

2024-07-25

Date of First Publication

2024-08-02

Date of Final Publication

2024-08-02

Open Access Status

  • Open Access