University of Lincoln
Browse

Variation in amino acid and lipid composition of latent fingerprints

Version 4 2024-03-12, 17:08
Version 3 2023-10-29, 14:01
journal contribution
posted on 2024-03-12, 17:08 authored by Ruth Croxton, Mark Baron, David Butler, Terry Kent, Vaughn Sears
<p>The enhancement of latent fingerprints, both at the crime scene and in the laboratory using an array of chemical, physical and optical techniques, permits their use for identification. Despite the plethora of techniques available, there are occasions when latent fingerprints are not successfully enhanced. An understanding of latent fingerprint chemistry and behaviour will aid the improvement of current techniques and the development of novel ones. In this study the amino acid and fatty acid content of ‘real’ latent fingerprints collected on a non-porous surface was analysed by gas chromatography–massspectrometry. Squalene was also quantified in addition. Hexadecanoic acid, octadecanoic acid and cis-9-octadecenoic acid were the most abundant fatty acids in all samples. There was, however, wide variation in the relative amounts of each fatty acid in each sample. It was clearly demonstrated that touching sebum-rich areas of the face immediately prior to fingerprint deposition resulted in a significant increase in the amount of fatty acids and squalene deposited in the resulting ‘groomed’ fingerprints. Serine was the most abundant amino acid identified followed by glycine, alanine and aspartic acid. The significantquantitative differences between the ‘natural’ and ‘groomed’ fingerprint samples seen for fatty acidswere not observed in the case of the amino acids. This study demonstrates the variation in latent fingerprint composition between individuals and the impact of the sampling protocol on the quantitative analysis of fingerprints.</p>

History

School affiliated with

  • Department of Life Sciences (Research Outputs)

Publication Title

Forensic Science International

Volume

199

Issue

1-3

Pages/Article Number

93-102

Publisher

Elsevier

ISSN

0379-0738

eISSN

1872-6283

Date Submitted

2010-10-22

Date Accepted

2010-06-15

Date of First Publication

2010-06-15

Date of Final Publication

2010-06-15

Date Document First Uploaded

2013-03-13

ePrints ID

3405

Usage metrics

    University of Lincoln (Research Outputs)

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC