Veterinary students' perspectives on their relationship with animals used in veterinary education

<p>Some veterinary colleges still use live animals to teach veterinary students clinical skills. However, there is a lack of literature understanding veterinary student perspectives on the use of animals in their education. Using a qualitative approach, this study aimed to explore 1) how the perceived quality of life of animals used for teaching affected veterinary student learning and emotional well-being, and 2) how student emotional well-being affected the care they provide for animals used for teaching. We conducted 10 focus groups and 2 interviews with 4th-year veterinary students (n = 43) participating in clinical rotations at two Canadian veterinary colleges. We analyzed the data inductively using template analysis and identified three themes. First, using animals in their education caused ethical and moral conflicts in students that had negative impacts on students’ emotional well-being; many of these conflicts arose when there was a lack of transparency about animal use or when harms to animals outweighed the benefits to student learning or animal welfare. Second, students’ well-being and the welfare of animals used for teaching were intertwined, suggesting that educational practices have implications for both. Third, supervisors and their teaching approaches, including the use of live animals or alternatives, had complex effects on student learning. In general, students preferred realistic and supportive learning experiences where they could provide a service to animals and their community. This study highlights the nuanced perspectives of veterinary students about the animals used in their education. We encourage veterinary colleges to carefully evaluate their use of institution-owned live animals within the curriculum, improve transparency about how these animals are used, and find effective pedagogical methods that consider implications to both student emotional well-being and animal welfare.</p>